In the shadow of
the recent announcement over at The Haunted Shoreline I came across this grisly story in the Accrington
Observer and the Lancashire Evening Telegraph. The synchronicity of one wave receding and then seeing
another strange tributary opening up was too speculative an opportunity to miss.
Certainly comment might be apt because – to make a suggestion – might one
future application of Shoreline’s psychedelic omnivision be in the direction of England ’s inland empire: its
serpentine network of streams, rivers and canals?
As for the story,
it reported the discovery of a dead python in the waters of the Leeds to
Liverpool canal. The 10ft carcass was found on the canal’s Huncoat section just
a few miles outside of Accrington in Lancashire. The story interested me for a
few reasons, not least because I grew up around there and the canal was always
a source of strangeness. A body of still water surrounded by coke ovens and empty
mills, redundant industry and exhausted fields. Snakes for some reason were
also a source of great fear for me and my sister. I didn’t have an actual
phobia per se, but snakes and similar
creatures always came to mind
whenever I thought about monsters or demons. I think it was this
image that did it. And this one. And not forgetting this
one.
I’ve also been
thinking a lot lately about memory and geography; where do we actually go when we think about a specific place,
particularly a place that we associate with childhood? Whether the conjuration
is positive or negative, this thought-place is inevitably simulacral. It’s a
place one builds out of nostalgia, longing or as part of an intentional act of
forgetting. Either way, when I saw the snake in the water it precisely summed
up the nature of this architecture. The
snake, like the projected place is a creature from the depths. Liminal: neither
in nor out. It’s something that floats around in liquid aether and occasionally
shows itself. A peculiar combination of myth and matter that’s uncanny insofar
as it generates a groundless but nonetheless resonant familiarity, a sense of homecoming
and recognition: I have found it, I am here.
The report in
the Telegraph hinted at this
ambiguity when it quoted RSPCA officer Charlotte Brooker:
It
is obviously an animal that has been kept as a pet and not something that would
naturally be found near the canal. It could be that someone has dumped their pet
in the canal so as to avoid the charges of disposing of it or it could be
something more sinister but we can only speculate at this stage.
Between
the ‘obvious’ and the ‘speculative’ there is the ‘sinister’. Sinister is an
interesting word. It’s generally used as part of the gothic lexicon of fear and
fright like “spooky”. It does denote that which is “suggestive of evil and
mischief” but there is a much more specific meaning connected to its role as a
mantic signifier. Sinister describes a particular category of omen, one that
“portends or indicates misfortune or disaster; full of dark or gloomy
suggestiveness; inauspicious, unfavorable”. The word took on this currency
because it originally related to a particular type of information, that which
is “prompted by malice” and given with “the intent to deceive or mislead”. The
link to prophecy comes via the idea that divination involves the reading of
signs sent through various natural phenomena. Such occurrences were intuited
across the elements including, of course, water. That which is sinister, then,
is a bad sign. It is not just that which is frightening but that which is
indicative of bad things to come. To describe an object or creature as sinister
is to suggest that it exists both here
and there. It has not just appeared
but has been sent and has broken through. Sinister thus describes exactly the
kind of thing we might expect to find in a half-imaginary place of memory and
it is precisely the right kind of terms in which to speak of the canal snake.
The
Observer also spoke of ‘Horror as remains of 10-foot snake are
spotted in canal’. The idea of the snake as an ill-omen could be archetypally
linked to myths of serpents crossing paths and fighting at forked roads. As for
horror, the discovery clearly connotes this in terms of its overt abjection.
However, as with sinister, ‘horror’ also has a more specialized meaning that
the resonance of the episode similarly manages to tease out. Horror is a term
of sensibility that relates to an experience of shuddering or shivering. In a leap of metaphor from effect to cause the
word also has an obscure sense that describes a shuddering or rippling on the
surface of water. As a figure of horror, the found snake encapsulates both of
these senses. It is an alien thing that physically troubles the surface of the
water, but in so doing also causes a disturbance in the waterways of the
imagination. It hints at a cryptozoological depth containing unknown creatures that
are potentially physically and philosophically dangerous. This is why The Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954)
remains such an effective horror film. The creature can emerge and attack from
beneath the surface but at the same the appearance of this pre-historic anomaly
disturbs a much wider set of preconceptions relating natural, human and anthropological
history.
Lovecraft’s
Arkham is full of such things and
there are glimpses of similar entities in the streets and factories of David A
Riley’s Grudge End. What
characterizes these fictional locations is their combination of horror and
deep, imagined histories. Both are also
literary conceits that work (at the very least at a genetic level) as superimpositions upon actual territories. Geographical re-imaging is a technique of habituation
just as much as it is a device of estrangement, but there is also something both
sinister and horrific about such a cathexis, perhaps inevitably so. The
conscious or unconscious construction of a place in the memory is an act of cosmogenesis, (the creation of a world
or universe) however much it is grounded in geographical specificity. Whilst
the boundaries of such a space are potentially vast they are also porous, open
to visitation from the outside in as well as the inside out. I’m not sure which
side of the door the snake is on.
Thanks for the mention James and the very interesting musings on the waterborne serpent. You probably saw that snake imagery was a recurrent motif on the Shoreline, but I'd like to suggest that this particular dead python could - if viewed through the omnivisual lens - be a signifier of Apollo, slayer of the mythic Python, see here:
ReplyDeletehttp://thehauntedshoreline.wordpress.com/2012/01/13/le-dauphin-acephale/
best wishes as always